Roughness Scenarios

This dataverse contains the inputs and products of hydrodynamic models with different roughness scenarios. Meshes of different resolution that were utilized in the mesh resolution anlaysis are also included.

Mesh Resolution of HEC-RAS Models: Average Point Spacing of 7.5m-15.0m

Hydrodynamic Model Input Data

Roughness Scenarios - Flow Inundation Extents:

Roughness Scenarios - Water Surface Elevations:

Between Roughness Scenarios - Differences in Water Surface Elevation:

Landcover+10% - Landcover+5%

Landcover+25% - Landcover+10%

Landcover+50% - Landcover+25%

Featured Dataverses

In order to use this feature you must have at least one published dataverse.

Publish Dataverse

Are you sure you want to publish your dataverse? Once you do so it must remain published.

Publish Dataverse

This dataverse cannot be published because the dataverse it is in has not been published.

Delete Dataverse

Are you sure you want to delete your dataverse? You cannot undelete this dataverse.

1 to 10 of 15 Results

Water Surface Elevations: Baseline Roughness Scenario Jun 9, 2020 FLUD Research Group, 2020, "Water Surface Elevations: Baseline Roughness Scenario", https://doi.org/10.18738/T8/G7T78B, Texas Data Repository, V1 Raster maps of water surface elevations (WSEs) that are output from the HEC-RAS 5.0.7 2D hydrodynamic model (Brunner, 2016), and associated with flow stages (0.1m – 11.63m) at 0.25m interval (N=44). These flow stages were output from simulations coincident with the baseline scena...
Water Surface Elevations: Landcover +5% Roughness Scenario Jun 9, 2020 FLUD Research Group, 2020, "Water Surface Elevations: Landcover +5% Roughness Scenario", https://doi.org/10.18738/T8/UEQZTC, Texas Data Repository, V1 Raster maps of water surface elevations (WSEs) that are output from the HEC-RAS 5.0.7 2D hydrodynamic model (Brunner, 2016), and associated with flow stages (0.1m – 11.63m) at 0.25m interval (N=44). These flow stages were output from simulations coincident with the scenario that...
Water Surface Elevations: Landcover +10% Roughness Scenario Jun 9, 2020 FLUD Research Group, 2020, "Water Surface Elevations: Landcover +10% Roughness Scenario", https://doi.org/10.18738/T8/LBWRDQ, Texas Data Repository, V1 Raster maps of water surface elevations (WSEs) that are output from the HEC-RAS 5.0.7 2D hydrodynamic model (Brunner, 2016), and associated with flow stages (0.1m – 11.63m) at 0.25m interval (N=44). These flow stages were output from simulations coincident with the scenario that...
Water Surface Elevations: Landcover +25% Roughness Scenario Jun 9, 2020 FLUD Research Group, 2020, "Water Surface Elevations: Landcover +25% Roughness Scenario", https://doi.org/10.18738/T8/EHFCMN, Texas Data Repository, V1 Raster maps of water surface elevations (WSEs) that are output from the HEC-RAS 5.0.7 2D hydrodynamic model (Brunner, 2016), and associated with flow stages (1.0m – 11.63m) at 0.25m interval (N=44). These flow stages were output from simulations coincident with the scenario that...
Water Surface Elevations: Landcover +50% Roughness Scenario Jun 9, 2020 FLUD Research Group, 2020, "Water Surface Elevations: Landcover +50% Roughness Scenario", https://doi.org/10.18738/T8/PYIEPU, Texas Data Repository, V1 Raster maps of water surface elevations (WSEs) that are output from the HEC-RAS 5.0.7 2D hydrodynamic model (Brunner, 2016), and associated with flow stages (1.0m – 11.63m) at 0.25m interval (N=44). These flow stages were output from simulations coincident with the scenario that...
Differences in Water Surface Elevation Between Roughness Scenarios: Landcover+10% - Landcover+5% Jun 9, 2020 FLUD Research Group, 2020, "Differences in Water Surface Elevation Between Roughness Scenarios: Landcover+10% - Landcover+5%", https://doi.org/10.18738/T8/QVSE8E, Texas Data Repository, V1 Raster maps of differences in water surface elevation (WSE) that are based on output from the HEC-RAS 5.0.7 2D hydrodynamic model (Brunner, 2016). The differences are between common flow stages at different roughness scenarios where patches associated with downed trees are 10% gr...
Differences in Water Surface Elevation Between Roughness Scenarios: Landcover+25% - Landcover+10% Jun 9, 2020 FLUD Research Group, 2020, "Differences in Water Surface Elevation Between Roughness Scenarios: Landcover+25% - Landcover+10%", https://doi.org/10.18738/T8/XCBXG3, Texas Data Repository, V1 Raster maps of differences in water surface elevation (WSE) that are based on output from the HEC-RAS 5.0.7 2D hydrodynamic model (Brunner, 2016). The differences are between common flow stages at different roughness scenarios where patches associated with downed trees are 25% gr...
Differences in Water Surface Elevation Between Roughness Scenarios: Landcover+50% - Landcover+25% Jun 9, 2020 FLUD Research Group, 2020, "Differences in Water Surface Elevation Between Roughness Scenarios: Landcover+50% - Landcover+25%", https://doi.org/10.18738/T8/3CPOPO, Texas Data Repository, V1 Raster maps of differences in water surface elevation (WSE) that are based on output from the HEC-RAS 5.0.7 2D hydrodynamic model (Brunner, 2016). The differences are between common flow stages at different roughness scenarios where patches associated with downed trees are 50% gr...
Mesh Resolution of HEC-RAS Models: Average Point Spacing of 7.5m-15.0m Jun 9, 2020 FLUD Research Group, 2020, "Mesh Resolution of HEC-RAS Models: Average Point Spacing of 7.5m-15.0m", https://doi.org/10.18738/T8/CES19C, Texas Data Repository, V1 Shapefiles of Computational Meshes for HEC-RAS Models for that have an average point spacing of 7.5m, 10.0m, 12.5m, and 15.0m (original). Created with the export feature of RAS-Mapper for HEC-RAS v 5.0.7 (Brunner, 2016) Brunner, G.W. (2016). HEC-RAS: River Analysis System, 2D Mod...
Hydrodynamic Model Input Data Jun 9, 2020 FLUD Research Group, 2020, "Hydrodynamic Model Input Data", https://doi.org/10.18738/T8/CNCXAN, Texas Data Repository, V1 Shapefiles and tables of values that are important for setting up a HEC-RAS model simulation for the Mission River Floodplain. Included in this dataset are the roughness patches that have Manning’s N values assigned to each patch for each of the five roughness scenarios (baseline...

Water Surface Elevations: Baseline Roughness Scenario

Jun 9, 2020

FLUD Research Group, 2020, "Water Surface Elevations: Baseline Roughness Scenario", https://doi.org/10.18738/T8/G7T78B, Texas Data Repository, V1

Raster maps of water surface elevations (WSEs) that are output from the HEC-RAS 5.0.7 2D hydrodynamic model (Brunner, 2016), and associated with flow stages (0.1m – 11.63m) at 0.25m interval (N=44). These flow stages were output from simulations coincident with the baseline scena...

Water Surface Elevations: Landcover +5% Roughness Scenario

Jun 9, 2020

FLUD Research Group, 2020, "Water Surface Elevations: Landcover +5% Roughness Scenario", https://doi.org/10.18738/T8/UEQZTC, Texas Data Repository, V1

Water Surface Elevations: Landcover +10% Roughness Scenario

Jun 9, 2020

FLUD Research Group, 2020, "Water Surface Elevations: Landcover +10% Roughness Scenario", https://doi.org/10.18738/T8/LBWRDQ, Texas Data Repository, V1

Water Surface Elevations: Landcover +25% Roughness Scenario

Jun 9, 2020

FLUD Research Group, 2020, "Water Surface Elevations: Landcover +25% Roughness Scenario", https://doi.org/10.18738/T8/EHFCMN, Texas Data Repository, V1

Raster maps of water surface elevations (WSEs) that are output from the HEC-RAS 5.0.7 2D hydrodynamic model (Brunner, 2016), and associated with flow stages (1.0m – 11.63m) at 0.25m interval (N=44). These flow stages were output from simulations coincident with the scenario that...

Water Surface Elevations: Landcover +50% Roughness Scenario

Jun 9, 2020

FLUD Research Group, 2020, "Water Surface Elevations: Landcover +50% Roughness Scenario", https://doi.org/10.18738/T8/PYIEPU, Texas Data Repository, V1

Differences in Water Surface Elevation Between Roughness Scenarios: Landcover+10% - Landcover+5%

Jun 9, 2020

FLUD Research Group, 2020, "Differences in Water Surface Elevation Between Roughness Scenarios: Landcover+10% - Landcover+5%", https://doi.org/10.18738/T8/QVSE8E, Texas Data Repository, V1

Raster maps of differences in water surface elevation (WSE) that are based on output from the HEC-RAS 5.0.7 2D hydrodynamic model (Brunner, 2016). The differences are between common flow stages at different roughness scenarios where patches associated with downed trees are 10% gr...

Differences in Water Surface Elevation Between Roughness Scenarios: Landcover+25% - Landcover+10%

Jun 9, 2020

FLUD Research Group, 2020, "Differences in Water Surface Elevation Between Roughness Scenarios: Landcover+25% - Landcover+10%", https://doi.org/10.18738/T8/XCBXG3, Texas Data Repository, V1

Differences in Water Surface Elevation Between Roughness Scenarios: Landcover+50% - Landcover+25%

Jun 9, 2020

FLUD Research Group, 2020, "Differences in Water Surface Elevation Between Roughness Scenarios: Landcover+50% - Landcover+25%", https://doi.org/10.18738/T8/3CPOPO, Texas Data Repository, V1

Mesh Resolution of HEC-RAS Models: Average Point Spacing of 7.5m-15.0m

Jun 9, 2020

FLUD Research Group, 2020, "Mesh Resolution of HEC-RAS Models: Average Point Spacing of 7.5m-15.0m", https://doi.org/10.18738/T8/CES19C, Texas Data Repository, V1

Shapefiles of Computational Meshes for HEC-RAS Models for that have an average point spacing of 7.5m, 10.0m, 12.5m, and 15.0m (original). Created with the export feature of RAS-Mapper for HEC-RAS v 5.0.7 (Brunner, 2016) Brunner, G.W. (2016). HEC-RAS: River Analysis System, 2D Mod...

Hydrodynamic Model Input Data

Jun 9, 2020

FLUD Research Group, 2020, "Hydrodynamic Model Input Data", https://doi.org/10.18738/T8/CNCXAN, Texas Data Repository, V1

Shapefiles and tables of values that are important for setting up a HEC-RAS model simulation for the Mission River Floodplain. Included in this dataset are the roughness patches that have Manning’s N values assigned to each patch for each of the five roughness scenarios (baseline...

Add Data

Share Dataverse

Link Dataverse

Reset Modifications